No one wants to have sex with an angry, bitter person. It's just unattractive. It won't begin or end well.

So when a cadre of women who hate President Trump's election declare to everyone that they're entering a period of abstinence, the response is generally relief.

I mean, let's play this out. Whoopi announces that she'll probably join the post-election sex strike.

The strength of any strike or boycott is numbers. Was Whoopi planning to serve that many people?

Boycotting Bud Light worked because millions of people stopped drinking it. At most, a sex strike affects one person (or perhaps a few people) who might have had relations with the angry, bitter thing withholding sex.

To the contrary, it seems like a plus. Fewer conceptions - and for the record, we're totally okay with less people like this in the world. Fewer abortions - because you know that would have been the goal with this bunch.

Men married to these harpies realize that through no fault of their own their wives choose to punish them. Not that I am a fan of divorce, but this could free up a few good men from an ungrateful spouse.

And what's the goal? That the world declares a mulligan and decides to redo an election?

It's the dumbest protest ever. It affects almost no one and is a net benefit to the rest of society. The trash kinda takes itself out here.

You angry, bitter things out there, you rock on with your bad self. Have a cupcake.